The empty default constructor like Widget() {}; is seen as a user defined default constructor, while Widget() = default; is not. This leads to default initialization in the former case, while value initialization in the latter, in definitions involving the form Widget w = new Widget(), Widget w{} etc.
this.value = default!; as I saw in a different question here, then it compiles just fine. But I don't understand what the ! is doing here, and it's pretty hard to google, since google seems to ignore punctuation in most cases. What does default! do?
Based on the replies posted for this question, the situation for the default constructor seems similar. Given that there is almost no difference in meaning between " =default " and " {} " for destructors, is there similarly almost no difference in meaning between these options for default constructors?
FOO="${VARIABLE:-default}" # FOO will be assigned 'default' value if VARIABLE not set or null. # The value of VARIABLE remains untouched. To do the same, as well as assign default to VARIABLE:
Is it possible to set default values for some struct member? I tried the following but, it'd cause syntax error: typedef struct { int flag = 3; } MyStruct; Errors: $ gcc -o testIt test.c test....
Default value of MyObject. See default Keyword in Generic Code (C# Programming Guide) (MSDN): In generic classes and methods, one issue that arises is how to assign a default value to a parameterized type T when you do not know the following in advance: Whether T will be a reference type or a value type. If T is a value type, whether it will be a numeric value or a struct. Given a variable t ...
Google is set as my default search engine. I have deleted all the other options except Google and Google Chrome. When I open a new tab and search either in the address bar or the search bar in the middle of the screen, my search ends up being completed by yahoo.